Quantum Information and Computing for Beginners: Basics of Qubit Transformations and Quantum Algorithms
Archit Dhingra
pp. 773-783 · 10.2478/qic-2025-0040
On this page
Abstract
Quantum information and quantum computing are based on the concept and manipulation of qubits. In this pedagogical Tutorial–written with the aim of assisting self-motivated undergraduate mathematics, physics, and engineering students–transformation of these qubits, especially the Hadamard transformation (H) and the phase shifter transformation (Φ), is illustrated. Two-qubit gates and their application in production of entangled states, along with quantum algorithms (including Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm), are included as well. With 2025 being declared as the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology (IYQ) by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), under the leadership of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the timeliness and relevance of this Tutorial, in order to nudge the budding researchers in the “quantum” direction, cannot be emphasized enough.
Open accessCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Keywords
- Hilbert space
- Bloch sphere
- quantum entanglement
- quantum algorithm
- quantum parallelism
- succinct quantum computing tutorial for university students
Suggested citation
Archit Dhingra (2025). Quantum Information and Computing for Beginners: Basics of Qubit Transformations and Quantum Algorithms. Quantum Information & Computation, 25(6), 773-783. https://doi.org/10.2478/qic-2025-0040
References (33)
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- F. Bloch (1951). Physica, 17, 272–281.DOI: 10.1016/0031-8914(51)90068-7Google Scholar
- C. E. Shannon (1948). Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xGoogle Scholar
- I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski (2017). Geometry of Quantum States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- J. Von Neumann (1996). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale (2011). In Statistical Mechanics (Third Edition), eds. R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale, Academic Press, Boston, Third Edit., pp. 39–90.DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-382188-1.00003-7Google Scholar
- I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski (2017). Geometry of Quantum States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres and W. K. Wootters (1993). Physical Review Letters, 70, 1895–1899.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895Google Scholar
- D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter and A. Zeilinger (1997). Nature, 390, 575–579.DOI: 10.1038/37539Google Scholar
- F. Grosshans and P. Grangier (2001). Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 64, 4.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.010301Google Scholar
- A. K. Pati and S. L. Braunstein (2000). Nature,404, 164–165.DOI: 10.1038/35004532Google Scholar
- A. Kalev and I. Hen (2008). Physical Review Letters, 100, 210502.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.210502Google Scholar
- D. Coppersmith, arXiv (2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0201067.Google Scholar
- A. Ekert, P. M. Hayden and H. Inamori (2007). In Coherent atomic matter waves, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 661–701.Google Scholar
- J. Wen, S. Cong and X. Zou (2012). Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), 5096–5101.DOI: 10.1109/WCICA.2012.6359443Google Scholar
- D. Deutsch, A. Barenco and A. Ekert (1995). Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 449, 669–677.DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1995.0065Google Scholar
- A. Barenco, C. H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D. P. Divincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor et al. (1995). Physical Review A, 52, 3457–3467.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3457Google Scholar
- S. L. Braunstein, A. Mann and M. Revzen (1992). Physical Review Letters, 68, 3259–3261.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3259Google Scholar
- C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu and B. Schumacher (1996). Physical Review A, 53, 2046–2052.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046Google Scholar
- H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf (2001). Physical Review Letters, 86, 910–913.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.910Google Scholar
- D. Sych and G. Leuchs (2009). New Journal of Physics, 11, 013006.DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/1/013006Google Scholar
- M. Mosca (2012). Computational Complexity: Theory, Techniques, and Applications, 9781461418, 2303–2333.DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1800-9_144Google Scholar
- R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchiavello and M. Mosca (1998). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 454, 339–354.DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0164Google Scholar
- D. Deutsch and R. Jozsa (1992). Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 439, 553–558.DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1992.0167Google Scholar
- D. Deutsch (1985). Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 400, 97–117.DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1985.0070Google Scholar
- E. Bernstein and U. Vazirani (1997). SIAM Journal on Computing, 26, 1411–1473.DOI: 10.1137/S0097539796300921Google Scholar
- P. W. Shor (2002). In Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, pp. 124–134.Google Scholar
- L. K. Grover (1997). Physical Review Letters, 79, 325–328.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325Google Scholar
- E. Grumbling and M. Horowitz (2019). Eds., Quantum Computing, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.DOI: 10.17226/25196Google Scholar
- R. Müller and F. Greinert (2023). Quantum Technologies: For Engineers, 1–216.DOI: 10.1515/9783110717457Google Scholar
- C. Bernhardt (2019). Quantum Computing for Everyone, The MIT Press.DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11860.001.0001Google Scholar
- C. Hughes, J. Isaacson, A. Perry, R. F. Sun and J. Turner. Quantum Computing for the Quantum Curious, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61601-4.DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61601-4Google Scholar
- J. Bley, E. Rexigel, A. Arias, N. Longen, L. Krupp, M. Kiefer-Emmanouilidis et al. (2024). Phys Rev Res, 6, 023077.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023077Google Scholar
